Gibson v. Samples

Fourth Circuit

Gibson v. Samples

202 F. 743, 121 C.C.A. 620, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1618

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 19, 1912·No. No. 1,105·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There are a number of assignments of error. In' terms, some of them raise questions of law. An examination of the record, however, shows that such questions are not material, if the conclusions of the court below as to the facts are correct. The referee had the witnesses before him. The conclusion he reached was confirmed by the learned judge of the court below. The record does not persuade us that they were mistaken.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There are a number of assignments of error. In' terms, some of them raise questions of law. An examination of the record, however, shows that such questions are not material, if the conclusions of the court below as to the facts are correct. The referee had the witnesses before him. The conclusion he reached was confirmed by the learned judge of the court below. The record does not persuade us that they were mistaken.

Affirmed.

Gibson v. Samples, 202 F. 743, 121 C.C.A. 620, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1618 (4th Cir. 1912).

Pincite

202 F. 743 (Gibson v. Samples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related