Gibson v. Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 30, 2016·No. Civil Action No. 2016-0219·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Aaron Gibson, :

:

Petitioner, :

v. : Civil Action No. 16-0219 (CKK)

:

Parole Commission, :

:

Respondent. :

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In February 2016, petitioner filed this action for a writ of habeas corpus while detained at the District of Columbia Jail on a parole violator warrant issued by the United States Parole Commission (“USPC”). Petitioner claims that the warrant was executed on January 6, 2016, but the Commission had yet to hold a hearing, in violation of the due process clause. See Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus at 5.

In response to the Court’s show cause order, the government contends that the petition is moot because petitioner is serving a sentence for a Virginia state conviction “and is no longer in custody pursuant to the USPC parole violator warrant.” United States’ Resp. at 1 [Dkt. # 7]. Indeed, the docket shows that petitioner was released from the D.C. Jail on March 17, 2016, and the court’s subsequent mailings have been returned undelivered. See Dkt. ## 4, 11, 12. In addition, petitioner has not complied with the Court’s May 2, 2016 Order--mailed to both the D.C. Jail and a detention center in Winchester, Virginia--by verifying his current address by May 24, 2016, and replying to the government’s response by June 3, 2016. Based on the

government’s documented response, then, this habeas action will be dismissed as moot. A separate order accompanies this memorandum.

___________s/_______________ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

DATE: June 30, 2016 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gibson v. Parole Commission, (D.D.C. 2016).

Gibson v. Parole Commission (Gibson v. Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.