Gibson v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Gibson v. Nelson

44 N.W.2d 732, 232 Minn. 435, 1950 Minn. LEXIS 762

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 10, 1950

DocketNo. 35,410

StatusPublished

This text of 44 N.W.2d 732 (Gibson v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gibson v. Nelson, 44 N.W.2d 732, 232 Minn. 435, 1950 Minn. LEXIS 762 (Mich. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petition by appellants to have a case, now pending in this court on appeal, remanded to the district court to enable the district court to rule upon a motion previously made in that court whereby appellants sought to have a decree of adoption set aside. The motion to set aside the district court decree was still pending in the district court when appellants appealed to this court from the decree of adoption.

In remanding we are not considering the merits. The granting of this motion, as was said in Jensen v. Fischer, 132 Minn. 475, 157 N. W. 498, “is not a suggestion of what result should follow.”

It is ordered that the case be remanded to enable appellants to have a determination of their motion to set aside the judgment.

The proceedings before the district court on the motion, including the court’s order on the motion to set aside the decree of adoption, will be certified to this court as a part of the return.

Petition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI