Gibson v. Motor Finance Co.
140 S.E. 424, 37 Ga. App. 392, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 712
Opinion
The judgment of the court below, directing the sale of certain personalty levied upon under foreclosure proceedings unless the defendant execute a condemnation money bond therefor, is not such a final .judgment as may be reviewed by writ of error. Jones v. Martens-Turner Co., 106 Ga. 267 (32 S. E. 137) ; Luke v. Gilley, 18 Ga. App. 327 (89 S. E. 343). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the writ of error must prevail.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gibson v. Motor Finance Co., 140 S.E. 424, 37 Ga. App. 392, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 712 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
140 S.E. 424 (Gibson v. Motor Finance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kent v. Jefferson Mortgage Co.
5 S.E.2d 46 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Reagin v. Stroud
180 S.E. 763 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Spires v. Beane
169 S.E. 386 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)