Gibson v. Jenkins
This text of Gibson v. Jenkins (Gibson v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6789
DONALD GREGORY GIBSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES L. JENKINS, Chairman; LINDA R. PITMAN, Vice Chairman; CHARLES L. WADDELL; CHARLES E. JAMES; KENT A. SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-117-7)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 25, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Gregory Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Donald Gregory Gibson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Gibson v. Jenkins, No. CA-00-
117-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gibson v. Jenkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-jenkins-ca4-2002.