Gibson v. Ingals

161 So. 395, 119 Fla. 214, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 955

Opinions

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice ELLIS and Mr. Justice TERRELL are of the opinion that the decree of Circuit Court should be reversed; while Mr. Justice BROWN, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice DAVIS are of the opinion that the said decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So.2d R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J. J., concur.