Gibson v. Gruner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gibson v. Gruner

715 So. 2d 379, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10425, 1998 WL 484504

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 19, 1998

DocketNo. 98-2066

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 715 So. 2d 379 (Gibson v. Gruner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gibson v. Gruner, 715 So. 2d 379, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10425, 1998 WL 484504 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Gibson seeks certiorari relief from an order of the circuit court, in its appellate capacity, dismissing as untimely his appeal of an order of the county court, entering final judgment in favor of the respondents in their action against him. On learning of the grounds for the petition, respondents’ counsel promptly investigated and promptly conceded that respondents’ motion to dismiss had been based on erroneous information his staff had received from the county court as to the date petitioner filed his notice of appeal, and that, in actuality, petitioner’s appeal was timely filed.

We commend respondents’ counsel for his prompt concession and grant the petition. The order dismissing petitioner’s appeal is quashed and the circuit court is directed on remand to reinstate petitioner’s appeal.

FARMER, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Gibson seeks certiorari relief from an order of the circuit court, in its appellate capacity, dismissing as untimely his appeal of an order of the county court, entering final judgment in favor of the respondents in their action against him. On learning of the grounds for the petition, respondents’ counsel promptly investigated and promptly conceded that respondents’ motion to dismiss had been based on erroneous information his staff had received from the county court as to the date petitioner filed his notice of appeal, and that, in actuality, petitioner’s appeal was timely filed.

We commend respondents’ counsel for his prompt concession and grant the petition. The order dismissing petitioner’s appeal is quashed and the circuit court is directed on remand to reinstate petitioner’s appeal.

FARMER, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

715 So. 2d 379, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10425, 1998 WL 484504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-gruner-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack