Gibson v. Gibson
162 S.E.2d 719, 224 Ga. 514, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 839
Opinion
This appeal is from the denial of appellant’s motion for new trial. The case was not reported, counsel could not agree as to the evidence, and the court was unable to remember it. Hence, there is no transcript of evidence in the record. Since the enumerations of error require consideration of the evidence and none is before us, they cannot be [515]*515reviewed. The judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed. Cowart v. Cowart, 223 Ga. 487 (150 SE2d 94).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gibson v. Gibson, 162 S.E.2d 719, 224 Ga. 514, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 839 (Ga. 1968).
162 S.E.2d 719 (Gibson v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lamb Bros. v. Industrial Credit Co.
184 S.E.2d 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)