Gibson v. Gibson
This text of 162 S.E.2d 719 (Gibson v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from the denial of appellant’s motion for new trial. The case was not reported, counsel could not agree as to the evidence, and the court was unable to remember it. Hence, there is no transcript of evidence in the record. Since the enumerations of error require consideration of the evidence and none is before us, they cannot be [515]*515reviewed. The judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed. Cowart v. Cowart, 223 Ga. 487 (150 SE2d 94).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 S.E.2d 719, 224 Ga. 514, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-gibson-ga-1968.