Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gibson v. Gibson

Gibson v. Gibson

858 So. 2d 360, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16205, 2003 WL 22453871
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 30, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-3070
StatusPublished

This text of 858 So. 2d 360 (Gibson v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibson v. Gibson, 858 So. 2d 360, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16205, 2003 WL 22453871 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that the trial court abused its discretion in modifying Appellee’s alimony obligation because there was no evidence of a substantial change in circumstances occurring after the entry of the original alimony award. See, e.g., Hanskat v. Hanskat, 716 So.2d 347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). The financial circumstances of the parties are essentially the same as they were at the time of the original alimony award. We, therefore, reverse the trial court’s order modifying the original alimony award, and remand.

ALLEN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hanskat v. Hanskat
716 So. 2d 347 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
858 So. 2d 360, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16205, 2003 WL 22453871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-gibson-fladistctapp-2003.