Gibson v. Eastern Rim & Wheel Co.
This text of 32 F.2d 774 (Gibson v. Eastern Rim & Wheel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The underlying question in this ease was the validity of tile patent involved’ because of the novelty of its alleged invention. No principles of law are involved.
The court below discussed the questions involved with unusual detail and thoroughness in an exhaustive opinion. The court has had the benefit of an equally thorough presentation of the ease by counsel for plaintiff in oral argument and comprehensive brief, but such presentation and our own study of the record fails to convince us the trial judge was in error. In view of his able opinion, and finding ourselves in accord therewith, we adopt it as expressive of our view and limit ourselves to affirming the deeree based upon it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 F.2d 774, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-eastern-rim-wheel-co-ca3-1929.