Gibson v. Curry
319 So. 2d 149, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15294
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1975·No. No. 75-816·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellants attempted interlocutory appeal from an order striking their third affirmative defense in an action on the law side of the court. This court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from such an order under Rule 4.2 F.A.R., and neither was the order of such nature as to be reviewable by common law certio-rari.
The appeal is therefore dismissed ex mero motu.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gibson v. Curry, 319 So. 2d 149, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15294 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
319 So. 2d 149 (Gibson v. Curry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MANATEE CTY. v. Estech Gen. Chemicals Corp.
402 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)