Gibson v. Curry

319 So. 2d 149, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15294
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 1, 1975
DocketNo. 75-816
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 319 So. 2d 149 (Gibson v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibson v. Curry, 319 So. 2d 149, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15294 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants attempted interlocutory appeal from an order striking their third affirmative defense in an action on the law side of the court. This court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from such an order under Rule 4.2 F.A.R., and neither was the order of such nature as to be reviewable by common law certio-rari.

The appeal is therefore dismissed ex mero motu.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MANATEE CTY. v. Estech Gen. Chemicals Corp.
402 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
319 So. 2d 149, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-curry-fladistctapp-1975.