Gibson v. Betts

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

Gibson v. Betts

10 F. Cas. 309, 1 Blatchf. 163

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

DecidedJune 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F. Cas. 309 (Gibson v. Betts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gibson v. Betts, 10 F. Cas. 309, 1 Blatchf. 163 (circtndny 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

NELSON, Circuit Justice,

decided, that after the adjudications on Woodworth’s patent, he would not, on a motion for an injunction, entertain any question as to the originality of Woodworth’s invention, or as to the validity of the re-issued patent. He also decided that the defendant’s machine was an infringement of Woodworth’s. Injunction granted.

[For other cases involving this patent, see note to Bicknell v. Todd, Case No. 1,3S9.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NELSON, Circuit Justice,

decided, that after the adjudications on Woodworth’s patent, he would not, on a motion for an injunction, entertain any question as to the originality of Woodworth’s invention, or as to the validity of the re-issued patent. He also decided that the defendant’s machine was an infringement of Woodworth’s. Injunction granted.

[For other cases involving this patent, see note to Bicknell v. Todd, Case No. 1,3S9.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F. Cas. 309, 1 Blatchf. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-betts-circtndny-1846.