Gibson v. Berry

Mississippi Supreme Court

Gibson v. Berry

66 Miss. 515

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 66 Miss. 515 (Gibson v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gibson v. Berry, 66 Miss. 515 (Mich. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

As the sale for taxes under which the plaintiff claimed was made when § 1709 of the code of 1871 was unrepealed, it applied to the sale, although subsequently repealed, and operated to preclude inquiry into the sale for any mere irregularity attending it. Nevin v. Bailey, 62 Miss. 433.

We know no reason why a court may not exclude evidence introduced by a defendant on the same grounds on which it would exclude evidence of the plaintiff.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

As the sale for taxes under which the plaintiff claimed was made when § 1709 of the code of 1871 was unrepealed, it applied to the sale, although subsequently repealed, and operated to preclude inquiry into the sale for any mere irregularity attending it. Nevin v. Bailey, 62 Miss. 433.

We know no reason why a court may not exclude evidence introduced by a defendant on the same grounds on which it would exclude evidence of the plaintiff.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 Miss. 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-berry-miss-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack