Gibson, Tracy Ray

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 8, 2015·No. WR-68,962-07·Published

Opinion

. C?~~///S~i `DU C\.M\LO§ CM»&, 1 'wz,@@»/M

mcwo 5 01 wm M¢ @_/>~, 0

T\\ m §W&>§QV\€ML~ AW( :`@Q£IW\S : \C”F{£/ Ow

RE@E@ '" Ww

©OUM UF ©WMM 4 §:5 sep w we

Ab@i&c@§ia,©§@fk

TRA¢Y RAY GIBSON #1436824 MARK STILES UNIT

3060 FM 3514

BEAUMONT, TEXAS 77705»7635

AUGUST 3lst¢ 2015

4145ch sUPERIOR DISTRICT couRT RE: TRIAL couRT N .: NACOGDOCHES couNTY F149622007 101 w. MAIN si:lWRoom 120 . von »mu U__» wR-ee 962~01

NAcocbocHEs, TEXAS 75961

Dear Cierk of Court. Mrs. boretta Cammack:

As of JULY lst, 2015. the Criminal Court of Appeals has "reconsidered" the Denial of my filing Article § ll. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court Denied the Application without written order on JANUARY 9th, 2008. The Cause of action of the arguement(s) and dispute over the mater1al of facts has now been remanded back to the Trial Court.

I am in receipt of your Supplemental Clerk's Record bi institutional legal- mail on the Mark Stiles Unit. Afterkreveiwing it. it has come to my attention that the "Order To Deny"...is resaonding to one of my subsequent filings of Articie § ll 07 dated NOVEMBER lO, 2014. The Original Filing was on AUGUST 2, 2007, with the Criminal Court of Apoeals. This Trial Court (l45th) has not addressed all the Grounds stated in either;Appiication. The (2) Two Main Issues originally raised were (l) Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; and (2) De£ective Indictment that omitted a Deadl{ weapon finding.

The Filing of Article~§.ll.07 in NOVENBER. 2014. raises the "lrreversable § Errors" the 145th Superior District Court has caused during the time l have been incarcerated, and causing unreasonable delay. 1 was entered into TDCJ in JUNE.20071 [SEE INMATE RECORDS "Time-Sliys"]. This Court has not addressed the claim I stated- in the Original Article § 11.07; about the Indictment omitting a Deadlj Weapon finding( which makes the Indictment invalid, an£ why didn't my Court Appointed Attorne} Mr¢ Gene Caldwell communicate to me in a "drivate§€onference"this clear ?ok¥& in law that would have a detrimental impact on the decision process to enter into

‘ (CONTINUED)

'Plea Bargain' intelligently, and or knowingly?

Furthermore. the Reporter’s Record included in the Court's Supplemental Clerk's Record has excluded in the Transcripts the oral pronouncement of the provisions of Article § 42.12~3(3) Offense, that is required when seeking a conviction for Aggravated Robberyo VTCA § 29 03 .

In conclusion all Filings of Article § ll 07 Applications of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure over the last 8 Years£ 4 Months and on- going has been BECAUSE of this Trial court's unreasonable delay to appropriately comply with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article § 12. Ol to present re-indictment within the limits. and not afterward: (4) Five Years from the date of the commission of the offense,

(a) Theft or Robbery.

lt has been the "Irreversible Errors" caused by this Court' s failure and neglect1 and unreasonable delay that allows me to invoke an ” nterlocutor¢~ §ppeal“; because the "Irreversible Errors" have violated my Constitutionai rights protected by the 4th and 15th Amendments of Due Process Of Law. Tnis Trial court conducted a criminal court proceeding: "Nunc Pro Tunc" on 10.18.2007 outised of my presence. and neglected to forward a photocopy of the "Nunc Pro Tunc Order" to TDCJ Records Division until (5) Five Years after the fact. to which TDCJ Reco- rds Division was in receipt 01 the post conviction order on DECEMBER, 2012.

I am hereby requesting this Trial court return - reply to all contents of this letter within (lO) Ten working Days from the date this letter is received. Failure to comply will result in this letter being "Notice ToThisCourt" as to

my interest to filing an ”Interlocutory‘Ap)eal" The Criminal court has inflicted

Irreparable InJury. i.e. incarceration. upon me.

Respectfully Submitted and executed by me on this §§ Day Of AUGUST; 2015._

TRACY RAY GIBSON

TDCJ~CIDUNO.1436824

MARK STILES UNIT

BEAUMONT 1 TEXAS 77705-7635

cAuSE No. F149622007 TRAcY GIBsoN #1436824, in THE 14STH JuuiciAt (Applicant) Pro se.

VS . DI STRI CT COURT GF

C¢‘~'»£OG|¢‘-`C¢"-Ca“a

sTATE oF TExAs ' 145Tu suptaioa DISTRICT NAcosoocuEs couNTY

101 w. mAIN sT., noon 110

NACUDOCHES COUNT! . TEXAS

@!009 W'-’|O:r

NAcocbocHEs, TExAs 7596."1“""'"'……"A

PLI '1" S MOI‘ION REQUBSTING LEAVE OE‘ COURT w 1111 TO GINAL ART. § ll. 07 WRIT OF HABEDS COR?US COMPLAINT SEEKING RELIEF FR(M FINAL FELON¥ CONVICTION

'10 THE HUORABLE JUDGE OF` SAID COURT:

NOW COMES TBAG! GIBSON #1436824. Pro se Applii ant tn this cause with this Applicant' s Motion Requesting Leave of Court §§ £Ies§h r1ginal Art. § ll 07

show:

J URISD IC‘l‘ION

This Court has Jurisdiction in this matter;Pursuant to Texas Rules 01

Appellate Procedure Rule 72.1 .

Applicant hereby presents to this Court an Application For Writ Of Habeas Corpus Seeking Relief From Final Felony Conviction under Code of Criminal Proc- edure, Article § ll. 07s wherein Applicant has 5Ameg dy€oihe complaint originally filed AUGUST 2nd. 2007, to include the irreversible errors and irreparable

'1nJury this Court' s unreasonable delay(s) has caused¢ The original complaint

stated (2) Two MaJor Grounds:(l) Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel.and (2)

Defeccive/Ihvaiid indictmenc.

Agplicant, comes now. to include the following Irreversible Errors and lrreparable InJury to be included in the Original Complaint because of the Trial

Court's unreasonable delaj.

(l) Trial Court conducted a "Nunc Pro Tunc" yroceebing outside the presence

of Applicant. denying me access to courts and:

(2) 'Nunc Pro Tunc‘ Order$wasn't delivered to TDCJ-Records Division until

(5) Five Years aftergthe fact. lt wasn't received until DECEMBERl 20l2:

wh"i$) Trial Court is"in non~compliance viEH“Texas CEdéwa“Criminal Procedure Article § lZiOl to gresent reindictment within the limit and not afterward accor- ding to (4) five {ears from the date of the commission of the offense, for (a) theft/robberji Statute of Limitations to present reindictment for a lesser included offense icc VTCA Penal Code § 29.02 Robbery; has expired because Applicant has been in custody of the State of Texas since MARCH 3rdg 2007 .

(4) Prosecutorial Misconduct by the District Attorney's Office in Nacogdo- ches County, utilized an invalid indictment, and "Nunc Pro Tunc" Orderithat can only correct ”Clerical Errors" was deployed for a conviction in a plea-bargainl

with Agplicant unintellegently and unknowingly.

CONCLUSION

The above mentioned causations are to be included in the Original Comglaint

because of the Trial Court's "Irreversible Errors" caused the "Irreparable InJurj"

suffered by incarceration.

RELIEF AND PRAYBR

Now Comes Applicant. seeking the praier and relief in accordance to Texss Rules of Aggellate Procedure Rule 43¢2(e) Vacate Trial Court's Judgement and Dismiss the case entirely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gibson, Tracy Ray, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Gibson, Tracy Ray (Gibson, Tracy Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related