Gibson & Johnson v. Axe

35 S.W.2d 828
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 23, 1931
DocketNo. 823.
StatusPublished

This text of 35 S.W.2d 828 (Gibson & Johnson v. Axe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibson & Johnson v. Axe, 35 S.W.2d 828 (Tex. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

LESLIE, J.

This case is companion to that of Gibson & Johnson v. B. E. Ward et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 35 S.W.(2d) 824, this day decided, and the opinion there disposes of the two questions presented by this appeal. The propositions were decided adversely to the appellants.

The question of defective execution of the original contract does not arise in this case, since John Axe was a widower at the time of its execution. The homestead question is out of the case.

The common question that does arise is whether the original contract was severable, and that was fully stated, discussed, and resolved adversely to appellants in Read v. Gibson & Johnson (Tex. Civ. App.) 12 S.W.(2d) 620; Gibson & Johnson v. Hill (Tex. Civ. App.) 34 S.W.(2d) 346; and in the Ward Case, supra.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment is affirmed.

HICKMAN, C. J., and FUNDERBURK, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibson & Johnson v. Ward
35 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Read v. Gibson & Johnson
12 S.W.2d 620 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 S.W.2d 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-johnson-v-axe-texapp-1931.