Gibson Donald Lewis v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 29, 2013
Docket03-13-00565-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Gibson Donald Lewis v. State (Gibson Donald Lewis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibson Donald Lewis v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00565-CR

Gibson Donald Lewis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CR-09-211254 HONORABLE CARLOS HUMBERTO BARRERA, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In August 2013, appellant pled guilty to misdemeanor driving while intoxicated

and was sentenced to four days in jail and a ninety-day suspension of his driver’s license. Before

entering into the plea agreement, appellant filed two motions to suppress the evidence from the

night of his arrest, both of which were denied. The record does not reflect that appellant waived or

withdrew his complaints related to the suppression of the evidence. The trial court’s certification

of his right to appeal states that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of

appeal,” however, rather than that it “is a plea-bargain case, but matters were raised by written

motion filed and ruled on before trial and not withdrawn or waived, and the defendant has the

right of appeal.”

In determining whether an appellant in a criminal case has the right to appeal, we

examine the trial court’s certification for defectiveness, defined as a certification that is “correct in form but which, when compared to the record before the court, proves to be inaccurate.” Dears v.

State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). If the certification appears to be defective, we

must obtain a correct certification. Id. at 614-15; see also Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c), 37.1.

Based on this record, it appears that the trial court’s certification, signed October 9,

2013, is incorrect. Therefore, we abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court either to

issue a new certification or to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law explaining how and

when appellant waived the complaints that he raised in his written, pretrial motions. See Dears,

154 S.W.3d at 614-15; Tex. R. App. P. 37.1. The trial court clerk is instructed to forward to this

Court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the amended certification or the findings and

conclusions no later than November 25, 2013.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Abated

Filed: October 29, 2013

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gibson Donald Lewis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-donald-lewis-v-state-texapp-2013.