Giblyn v. Stevens
This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1130 (Giblyn v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff sought and obtained recovery for failure of the defendant to repair as speedily as possible premises leased by her from the defendant and damaged by fire. Assuming on the statements in the brief of the appellant’s counsel, who has not caused the lease, an admitted exhibit, to be included in the return, that such obligation rested upon the defendant, there were presented but questions of fact, the determination of which below calls for no interference in this court. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 N.Y.S. 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giblyn-v-stevens-nyappterm-1905.