Gibbs v. Wohl

55 F.2d 494, 19 C.C.P.A. 1002, 1932 CCPA LEXIS 71
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedFebruary 9, 1932
DocketNo. 3145
StatusPublished

This text of 55 F.2d 494 (Gibbs v. Wohl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibbs v. Wohl, 55 F.2d 494, 19 C.C.P.A. 1002, 1932 CCPA LEXIS 71 (ccpa 1932).

Opinion

Per curiam:

It appears from the record in the foregoing case that the patent, No. 1285117, issued November 19,1918, to Harry D. Gibbs and Courtney Conover, employees of the Government of the United States, in the Department of Agriculture, has been by them assigned to the Government of the United States of America and the people thereof, in accordance with the provisions of the act of March 3, 1883 (22 Stats. 625), and that said the Government of the United States is the real party in interest in the interference proceedings appealed to this court, in the names of said Gibbs and Conover, from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office.

The court, therefore, orders and directs that no fees shall be required to be paid to the clerk of this court, as provided by Buie V of the court, for filing and docketing said appeal or for supervising the printing of the record therein. It is the opinion of the court that the proviso of paragraph 4 of the “ schedule ” of said Buie V should apply, and it is directed that the same shall hereafter apply, to appeals by the Government in patent cases as well as in customs cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 F.2d 494, 19 C.C.P.A. 1002, 1932 CCPA LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-wohl-ccpa-1932.