Gibbs v. United States

21 C.M.A. 661
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedJuly 7, 1971
DocketNo. 71-27
StatusPublished

This text of 21 C.M.A. 661 (Gibbs v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibbs v. United States, 21 C.M.A. 661 (cma 1971).

Opinion

On consideration of the “Application for Writ of Prohibition” filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that said application is predicated upon the contention that court-martial jurisdiction does not exist in view of the existence of “a judicial system in the civilian community of the Ryukyu Islands which provides all of the constitutional protections and safeguards in criminal trials to which American citizens are entitled”; and it further appearing that petitioner is presently charged with wrongful possession of hypodermic syringes and needles in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC, Sec. 892, and with the wrongful possession of 43.82 grams of heroin and the wrongful sale of heroin, both in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code, supra, 10 USC, Sec. 934, offenses over which courts-martial necessarily have jurisdiction whether committed on or off base (United States v Beeker, 18 USCMA 563, 40 CMR 275 (1969)), it is, by the Court, this 7th day of July 1971,

ORDERED:

That said application be, and the same is, hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Beeker
18 C.M.A. 563 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 C.M.A. 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-united-states-cma-1971.