Gibbs v. Swords
This text of 110 S.E. 499 (Gibbs v. Swords) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where the defendant denies any indebtedness whatsoever to the plaintiff, but in his plea makes a tender of part of the amount sued for, in full satisfaction of the plaintiff’s claim, which tender is full [178]*178and complete and measures up to all the requirements of a tender properly made, the tender is an admission of liability to the plaintiff by the defendant of the amount tendered; and a verdict finding for the defendant generally, and a judgment for the defendant accordingly, are unsupported by the evidence and contrary to law. See 29 R. C. L. 650; 28 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law, 15.
2. No other error of law appears.
3. The trial judge erred in overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 S.E. 499, 28 Ga. App. 177, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-swords-gactapp-1922.