Gibbs v. State

34 Tex. 134
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1871
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Tex. 134 (Gibbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibbs v. State, 34 Tex. 134 (Tex. 1871).

Opinion

Ogden, J.

The judgment in this case must be reversed, because of a fatal error in the verdict of the jury. The defendant was indicted for the theft of a gelding, and the jury found him guilty of “ horse stealing.” He was therefore indicted and tried for one offense, and the jury found him guilty of another. (See Jordt v. The State, 31 Texas, 571.)

We presume the verdict was written out by the jury, under the mistaken idea that a gelding is a horse, and it was the duty of the district attorney and the court to have had the verdict of the jury corrected, or else to give the defendant a new trial.

[136]*136We also think the court erred in permitting the district attorney: to prove individual instances of bad character of the defendant,. disconnected with the charge for which he was being tried, in re^. buttal of proof of a general good character. . . :

. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. 1

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jordt v. State
31 Tex. 571 (Texas Supreme Court, 1869)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Tex. 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-state-tex-1871.