Gibbs v. State
This text of 309 S.W.3d 877 (Gibbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Thomas Gibbs appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his convictions for robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, RSMo 2000, and felony resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMo Cum Supp.2009, and concurrent sentences of eighteen years and four years imprisonment, respectively. He contends that his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to seek suppression of evidence at trial and to raise on direct appeal a claim that his arrest was not supported by probable cause.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 S.W.3d 877, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 668, 2010 WL 1957022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-state-moctapp-2010.