Gibbs v. State
804 So. 2d 456, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15696, 2001 WL 1359851
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 7, 2001·No. No. 4D01-4108·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed, with directions for trial court to advise appellant in open court of the terms of his sentence including his minimum mandatory sentences. See Gardner v. State, 699 So.2d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)(holding that double jeopardy clause and rule governing motions to correct sentence were not violated when the trial court held a hearing to correct the court’s prior oral pronouncement to reflect a minimum mandatory term).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gibbs v. State, 804 So. 2d 456, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15696, 2001 WL 1359851 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
804 So. 2d 456 (Gibbs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sumpter v. State
837 So. 2d 1164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)