Gibbs v. State Commissioner 2124

Fourth Circuit

Gibbs v. State Commissioner 2124

558 F. App'x 333

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2014·No. No. 13-7947·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Gibbs, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1977). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gibbs v. State Comm’r # 2124, No. 8:13-cv-03108-PWG, 2013 WL 6075645 (D.Md. Nov. 15, 2013). We deny Gibbs’ motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Gibbs, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1977). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gibbs v. State Comm’r # 2124, No. 8:13-cv-03108-PWG, 2013 WL 6075645 (D.Md. Nov. 15, 2013). We deny Gibbs’ motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gibbs v. State Commissioner 2124, 558 F. App'x 333 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

558 F. App'x 333 (Gibbs v. State Commissioner 2124) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related