Gibbs v. State Commissioner 2124
This text of 558 F. App'x 333 (Gibbs v. State Commissioner 2124) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Christopher Gibbs, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1977). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gibbs v. State Comm’r # 2124, No. 8:13-cv-03108-PWG, 2013 WL 6075645 (D.Md. Nov. 15, 2013). We deny Gibbs’ motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
558 F. App'x 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-state-commissioner-2124-ca4-2014.