Gibbs v. Smith

125 S.E. 736, 33 Ga. App. 37, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 695
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1924
Docket15757
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 736 (Gibbs v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibbs v. Smith, 125 S.E. 736, 33 Ga. App. 37, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 695 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

Under all of the facts of the case, it does not affirmatively appear that the judge abused his discretion in denying the motion to set aside the verdict and judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 736, 33 Ga. App. 37, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-smith-gactapp-1924.