Gibbs v. Simcote, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Gibbs v. Simcote, Inc.

1995 Ohio 73, 71 Ohio St. 3d 651

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 5, 1995

Docket1993-2429

StatusPublished

This text of 1995 Ohio 73 (Gibbs v. Simcote, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gibbs v. Simcote, Inc., 1995 Ohio 73, 71 Ohio St. 3d 651 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 71 Ohio St.3d 651.]

GIBBS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SIMCOTE, INC., APPELLEE. [Cite as Gibbs v. Simcote, Inc., 1995-Ohio-73.] Workers' compensation—Proof required to establish that an employer has committed an intentional tort against an employee. (No. 93-2429—Submitted February 21, 1995—Decided April 5, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-93-15. __________________ John S. Marshall; Hobson & Kolman and Gordon G. Hobson, for appellants. Calfee, Halter & Griwold and Richard P. Goddard; Frericks & Howard and Thomas Frericks, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc. (1991), 59 Ohio St.3d 115, 570 N.E.2d 1108. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 71 Ohio St.3d 651.]

GIBBS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SIMCOTE, INC., APPELLEE. [Cite as Gibbs v. Simcote, Inc., 1995-Ohio-73.] Workers' compensation—Proof required to establish that an employer has committed an intentional tort against an employee. (No. 93-2429—Submitted February 21, 1995—Decided April 5, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-93-15. __________________ John S. Marshall; Hobson & Kolman and Gordon G. Hobson, for appellants. Calfee, Halter & Griwold and Richard P. Goddard; Frericks & Howard and Thomas Frericks, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc. (1991), 59 Ohio St.3d 115, 570 N.E.2d 1108. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1995 Ohio 73, 71 Ohio St. 3d 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-simcote-inc-ohio-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack