Gibbs v. Ozmint
This text of Gibbs v. Ozmint (Gibbs v. Ozmint) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7189
JOSEPH HUGO GIBBS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JON E. OZMINT, as the Director of SCDC, et al.; RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-03955-PMD)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 5, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Hugo Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Joseph Hugo Gibbs appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and
denying Gibbs’ motion to remand to state court and dismissing
Gibbs’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. Additionally, Gibbs
appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion for
rehearing, but granting in part his motion to amend judgment to
reflect dismissal without prejudice. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Gibbs v. Ozmint, No.
3:08-cv-03955-PMD (D.S.C. Aug. 5, 2009; July 26, 2010; filed
Aug. 5, 2010 & entered Aug. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gibbs v. Ozmint, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-ozmint-ca4-2011.