Gibbs v. Harrelson
This text of 94 S.E. 235 (Gibbs v. Harrelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To a suit by a creditor against grantees in a deed to land executed by Ms debtor, for cancellation of the deed, and for judgment on the debt, the grantor (or, if dead, his legal representative) is a necessary party; and where the petition fails to make the legal representative of the deceased debtor a party, it is properly dismissed on demurrer-. Biggs v. Silvey, 140 Ga. 762 (79 S. E. 857); Kehoe v. Rourke, 131 Ga. 269 (62 S. E. 185) ; 9 C. J. 1227. This cáse differs from that of Moore v. Smith, 121 Ga. 479, 482 (49 S. E. 601). In that case the suit was against the widow, who was the sole heir, and who took possession without administration, there being no cancellation sought.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.E. 235, 147 Ga. 404, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-harrelson-ga-1917.