Gibbs v. Davis

11 Or. 288
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1884·Published

Opinion

By tbe Court:

A complaint alleging the retainer of the plaintiff as an attorney and counsellor at law, a promise by the defendant to pay the reasonable worth of the plaintiff’s services, the rendering of certain services under such retainer, the subsequent discharge of the plaintiff, and the reasonable worth of the services rendered, states a good cause of action. A demand of payment in such a case is not necessary.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gibbs v. Davis, 11 Or. 288 (Or. 1884).

11 Or. 288 (Gibbs v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.