Gibbs v. D'Angelo
This text of 265 A.D.2d 833 (Gibbs v. D'Angelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motions granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. After the Town of Hamlin advised defendant Michael D’Angelo that trash was being dumped on his property, D’Angelo directed his employee, defendant Kenneth Gay, to construct a chain barrier across the road to bar access to the property. The chain was painted with fluorescent paint, orange on the road side and green on the property side. Plaintiffs son, age 14, drove into the chain while riding a motor bike on D’Angelo’s property. Defendants established that D’Angelo did not owe a duty “to keep the premises safe for entry or use by others for * * * motorized vehicle operation for recreational purposes * * * or to give warning of any hazardous condition or * * * structure * * * on such premises to persons entering for such purposes” (General Obligations Law § 9-103 [1] [a]). Gay, as D’Angelo’s agent, also is protected by the statute (see, Albright v Metz, 88 NY2d 656, 665). Even assuming, arguendo, that the green paint camouflaged the chain as plaintiff contends, we conclude that any negligence in that regard is immaterial (see, Sega v State of New York, 60 NY2d 183, 192). Plaintiff failed to submit proof
[834]*834in evidentiary form that defendants willfully or maliciously failed to guard or warn against a dangerous condition (see, General Obligations Law § 9-103 [2] [a]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Polito, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D.2d 833, 695 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-dangelo-nyappdiv-1999.