Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Gibbs v. Cass

Gibbs v. Cass

431 S.W.2d 662, 1968 Mo. App. LEXIS 665
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 14, 1968
Docket32893
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 431 S.W.2d 662 (Gibbs v. Cass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibbs v. Cass, 431 S.W.2d 662, 1968 Mo. App. LEXIS 665 (Mo. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

RUDDY, Judge.

This is a suit in equity to enjoin the alleged violation of a restrictive covenant prohibiting the resubdivision of a lot owned by defendants. Defendants in their answer deny the applicability of the restrictive covenant to their proposed action and plead affirmative defenses of waiver and abandonment of the restrictive covenant and change in the character and condition, since the adoption of the restrictive covenant, of the neighborhood within which the properties owned by plaintiffs and defendants is situated. Injunctive relief was granted plaintiffs and defendants appealed.

Plaintiffs brought this action as property owners in the Heather Acres Subdivision and additionally, Thomas A. Gibbs, John W. Schaper and John C. Bodine brought it as Trustees of said subdivision. Most of the material facts have been agreed to by the parties and are contained in a stipulation signed by the attorneys for the respective parties and filed in the trial court. Other facts were supplied by the witnesses for the respective parties. We observe no significant disagreement between the parties as to the pertinent facts.

The Glen Oaks Corporation was the owner of a large tract of land and at some time prior to August 11, 1950 it caused said tract of land to be subdivided into lots. On the aforesaid date said Glen Oaks Corporation caused a plat, showing said property as it was subdivided, to be recorded in the office of the Recorder of Deeds for St. Louis County, Missouri. A reproduction of said plat as filed (except as noted hereinafter) is inserted here in reduced form.

*665 TmH0zap8XZK9u8RryN7RPbI

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Millstone Property Owners Association, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam of St. Louis, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and Fogerty Farms, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2024
Wallace v. Grasso
119 S.W.3d 567 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)
MacKey v. Griggs
61 S.W.3d 312 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)
Stolba v. Vesci
909 S.W.2d 706 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995)
Parkton Ass'n v. Armstrong
878 S.W.2d 50 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994)
Forst v. Bohlman
870 S.W.2d 442 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994)
Dierberg v. Wills
700 S.W.2d 461 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1985)
Udo Siebel-Spath v. Construction Enterprises, Inc.
633 S.W.2d 86 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1982)
Lake Wauwanoka, Inc. v. Spain
622 S.W.2d 309 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1981)
Ashelford v. Baltrusaitis
600 S.W.2d 581 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)
Melson v. Guilfoy
595 S.W.2d 404 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)
Sandstrom v. Larsen
583 P.2d 971 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1978)
Placke v. Haggerty
562 S.W.2d 743 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
Eyerman v. Mercantile Trust Co., NA
524 S.W.2d 210 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1975)
Lake Saint Louis Community Association v. Kamper
503 S.W.2d 447 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1973)
Minton v. Lichtenstein
487 S.W.2d 43 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
431 S.W.2d 662, 1968 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbs-v-cass-moctapp-1968.