Gibbs v. Bauknecht

Fourth Circuit

Gibbs v. Bauknecht

262 F. App'x 539

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2008·No. No. 07-7513·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jhan P. Gibbs, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gibbs v. Bauknecht, No. 6:07-cv-00735-GRA, 2007 WL 2822382 (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [540]*540presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jhan P. Gibbs, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gibbs v. Bauknecht, No. 6:07-cv-00735-GRA, 2007 WL 2822382 (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [540]*540presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gibbs v. Bauknecht, 262 F. App'x 539 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

262 F. App'x 539 (Gibbs v. Bauknecht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related