Gibbs, H. v. PPB
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
HENRY GIBBS, JR., : No. 84 WM 2023 :
Petitioner : : :
v. : : :
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, : :
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of February, 2024, the “Application for Extraordinary
Relief,” the “Motion to Present Evidence,” the “Motion for Summary Judgment,” the
“Motion for Clarification,” and the Motion to Expedite are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is
not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gibbs, H. v. PPB (Gibbs, H. v. PPB) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.