Gibbons v. State

99 S.E. 894, 24 Ga. App. 130, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 445
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 22, 1919
Docket10515
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 894 (Gibbons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibbons v. State, 99 S.E. 894, 24 Ga. App. 130, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 445 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Where in a criminal case the defendant’s guilt was clearly and positively established by legal and competent testimony of unimpeached witnesses, the admission of hearsay testimony from another witness, even as to a material fact, was not prejudicial to the defendant, when its exclusion could not have produced a different verdict. The admission of such evidence was harmless and affords no ground for a new trial.

2.- The verdict is supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crider v. State
105 S.E.2d 506 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 894, 24 Ga. App. 130, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbons-v-state-gactapp-1919.