Gibbons v. State
99 S.E. 894, 24 Ga. App. 130, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 445
Opinion
1. Where in a criminal case the defendant’s guilt was clearly and positively established by legal and competent testimony of unimpeached witnesses, the admission of hearsay testimony from another witness, even as to a material fact, was not prejudicial to the defendant, when its exclusion could not have produced a different verdict. The admission of such evidence was harmless and affords no ground for a new trial.
2.- The verdict is supported by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gibbons v. State, 99 S.E. 894, 24 Ga. App. 130, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 445 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
99 S.E. 894 (Gibbons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crider v. State
105 S.E.2d 506 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)