Gibbons v. Poe (In re Poe)

158 B.R. 566, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1385
CourtDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island
DecidedSeptember 15, 1993
DocketBankruptcy No. 92-12303; Adv. No. 92-1173
StatusPublished

This text of 158 B.R. 566 (Gibbons v. Poe (In re Poe)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibbons v. Poe (In re Poe), 158 B.R. 566, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1385 (D.R.I. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

Heard on August 19, 1993, on this Court’s sua sponte Order to Show Cause regarding counsels’ failure to file a Joint Pre-trial Statement in the above captioned adversary proceeding, as ordered. This unnecessarily prolonged matter has previously been scheduled for show cause hearings, and counsel have requested and been granted three extensions already. The most recent filing deadline, set for August 13, 1993, was ignored, and neither attorney appeared for the 9:30 a.m. show cause hearing, but Plaintiff’s attorney, Richard Walsh, telephoned the Clerk’s Office at [567]*5679:41 a.m. stating that he forgot to call earlier and, without explanation, reported that “it was all right to dismiss the adversary proceeding.”

Counsels’ behavior in this proceeding is irresponsible, and cannot be tolerated if the Court is to operate efficiently.1 See In re Arrow Plumbing and Heating, Inc., 150 B.R. 85 (Bankr.D.R.I.1993). Accordingly, sanctions in the amount of $500 are assessed jointly and severally against both attorneys, and should be paid forthwith to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court. Since the respondents herein are the ones most familiar with the reason(s) for such unexplained foot dragging, we initially leave the task of apportioning said payment to them, but the Court will make the allocation, after hearing, if the attorneys are unable to do so. Finally, counsel are advised that this Order runs against them personally, and is not to be passed on to their respective clients.

Enter Judgment consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Arrow Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
150 B.R. 85 (D. Rhode Island, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 B.R. 566, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbons-v-poe-in-re-poe-rid-1993.