GIBBONS v. COMMISSIONER

2006 T.C. Summary Opinion 106, 2006 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 7
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJuly 13, 2006
DocketNo. 5464-05S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2006 T.C. Summary Opinion 106 (GIBBONS v. COMMISSIONER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GIBBONS v. COMMISSIONER, 2006 T.C. Summary Opinion 106, 2006 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 7 (tax 2006).

Opinion

CHRISTINE L. GIBBONS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
GIBBONS v. COMMISSIONER
No. 5464-05S
United States Tax Court
T.C. Summary Opinion 2006-106; 2006 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 7;
July 13, 2006, Filed

*7 PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.

Christine L. Gibbons, pro se.
Bryan E. Sladek, for respondent.
Couvillion, D. Irvin

Couvillion, D. Irvin

COUVILLION, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 in effect at the time the petition was filed. 1 The decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be cited as authority.

Respondent determined a deficiency of $ 3,044 in petitioner's 2002 Federal income tax. The sole issue for decision is whether petitioner is liable for the 10-percent additional tax under section 72(t) for an early distribution from a qualified retirement plan.

Some of the facts were stipulated. Those facts and the accompanying exhibits are so found and are incorporated herein by reference. Petitioner's legal residence*8 at the time the petition was filed was Casco Township, Michigan.

Petitioner was employed as a schoolteacher by the Fraser Public School System (the school system). The school system maintained a pension plan for its employees (including petitioner), which qualified, as stipulated by the parties, as a section 403(b) plan.

During the year 2002, petitioner, as an employee and a participant in the pension plan, withdrew $ 67,552.64 from the plan, the proceeds of which were to fund her daughter's higher education expenses.

On her Federal income tax return for 2002, petitioner reported the entire amount of the pension plan withdrawal as income; however, petitioner failed to report a liability for the 10-percent section 72(t) additional tax for an early withdrawal from a qualified pension plan. In the administrative review or audit of petitioner's tax return, the IRS agreed that $ 37,112.64 of the $ 67,552.64 withdrawn from the pension plan was appropriately expended for the qualified higher education expenses of petitioner's daughter under section 72(t)(2)(E), and, therefore, the section 72(t) addition to tax was not applicable to that portion of the distribution. The remainder of the*9 pension plan distribution, or $ 30,440, was determined to be subject to the section 72(t) additional tax for the reason that petitioner did not substantiate that this portion of the distribution was used for higher education expenses.

At trial, respondent's position was that no portion of the $ 67,552.64 early distribution qualified for higher education expenses for the reason that the pension plan of the school system was not in the category of qualified plans as to which the provisions of section 72(t)(2)(E) are applicable. The parties stipulated, as noted above, that the school system plan was qualified under section 403(b). 2

*10 Section 72(t)(1) imposes an additional tax on distributions from a "qualified retirement plan" equal to 10-percent of the portion of such amount that is includable in gross income unless the distribution comes within one of several statutory exceptions. For purposes of the 10-percent additional tax, a qualified retirement plan includes both a section 401(k) plan and an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity. See secs. 72(t)(1), 401(a), (k)(1), 4974(c)(1), (4)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Uscinski v. Comm'r
2005 T.C. Memo. 124 (U.S. Tax Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2006 T.C. Summary Opinion 106, 2006 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbons-v-commissioner-tax-2006.