Gibbons v. Cochran
This text of 32 Pa. Super. 185 (Gibbons v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question raised upon these appeals has been considered and passed upon in Martin v. Greenwood, 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 245, Caner v. Bergner, 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 220, Oil City Building & Loan Association v. Shanfelter, 29 Pa. Superior Ct. 251, and as we remarked in the recent cases of Haspel v. O’Brien and Haspel v. Robinson, wherein we reconsidered the question, no useful purpose would be served by a further discussion of it by us.
The decree of distribution is affirmed, the costs of each of the above-mentioned appeals to be paid by the appellant therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Pa. Super. 185, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbons-v-cochran-pasuperct-1906.