Gibbons Construction Co. v. Tenneco, Inc. (In Re Gibbons Construction, Inc.)

46 B.R. 193, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5128, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 463
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky
DecidedAugust 30, 1984
Docket6:05-misc-00033
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 46 B.R. 193 (Gibbons Construction Co. v. Tenneco, Inc. (In Re Gibbons Construction, Inc.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibbons Construction Co. v. Tenneco, Inc. (In Re Gibbons Construction, Inc.), 46 B.R. 193, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5128, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 463 (E.D. Ky. 1984).

Opinion

ORDER

WILHOIT, District Judge.

This action is before the Court on the plaintiff’s motion to withdraw reference of this matter to the Bankruptcy Court. At the time plaintiff moved for withdrawal of reference, the Bankruptcy Court, pursuant to the Emergency Rules for the Continued Operation of the Bankruptcy Court, Rule (d)(1)(D), was unable to conduct a jury trial. These Rules are now superceded by the Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act of 1984 which became law this past July 10, 1984.

*194 Under 28 U.S.C. § 157 as amended by that Act, the district courts are empowered to refer any or all cases arising under or related to cases arising under Title II of the United States Code, except personal injury, tort or wrongful death claims, to the Bankruptcy Judge of this District.

The District Judges of the Eastern District Court of Kentucky issued a standing reference order July 18, 1984 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157 as provided for in the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments. The Bankruptcy Court may and should, pursuant to that Order, determine the matters involved in this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the movant’s motion to withdraw reference of this matter to the bankruptcy court for the reason that said court may not conduct a jury trial be and same is OVERRULED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Mark Jay Kaufman, P.A.
78 B.R. 309 (N.D. Florida, 1987)
Davidson v. Limerick (In Re Answerfone, Inc.)
67 B.R. 167 (E.D. Arkansas, 1986)
Blackman v. Seton (In Re Blackman)
55 B.R. 437 (District of Columbia, 1985)
MacOn Prestressed Concrete Co. v. Duke
46 B.R. 727 (M.D. Georgia, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 B.R. 193, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5128, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbons-construction-co-v-tenneco-inc-in-re-gibbons-construction-kyed-1984.