Gibb Vs. Dist. Ct. (Gibb)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 27, 2020·No. 81991·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHRISTON M. GIBB, No. 81991 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE CHARLES J. HOSKIN, DISTRICT JUDGE, A BROWN UFREME C.OURT

Respondents, and FARRAH L. GIBB, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This emergency petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court's order incident to divorce. As directed, real party in interest has filed an expedited answer to the petition.

Having considered the parties arguments and the attached documents, we decline to exercise our extraordinary discretion to intervene in this emergency manner. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (providing that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted). This matter presents a complex procedural history and significant issues

warranting thorough review, for which the emergency nature of this matter does not allow. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

A•A.V.**%-V ,J Stiglich

cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Alex B. Ghibaudo, PC. McFarling Law Group Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gibb Vs. Dist. Ct. (Gibb), (Neb. 2020).

Gibb Vs. Dist. Ct. (Gibb) (Gibb Vs. Dist. Ct. (Gibb)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related