Giarrusso v. Giarrusso

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Giarrusso v. Giarrusso

528 So. 2d 399, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1115, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1855, 1988 WL 44495

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 1988·No. No. 87-1550·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order declining to exercise jurisdiction over the child based on its determination that California was the appropriate forum for this litigation. See Williams v. Starnes, 522 So.2d 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Nelson v. Nelson, 433 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Trujillo v. Trujillo, 378 So.2d 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); §§ 61.1304-1308, Fla.Stat. (1987). Because we conclude that this case involving custody of a child has lingered too long in the Florida courts, we dispense with rehearing.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order declining to exercise jurisdiction over the child based on its determination that California was the appropriate forum for this litigation. See Williams v. Starnes, 522 So.2d 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Nelson v. Nelson, 433 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Trujillo v. Trujillo, 378 So.2d 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); §§ 61.1304-1308, Fla.Stat. (1987). Because we conclude that this case involving custody of a child has lingered too long in the Florida courts, we dispense with rehearing.

Affirmed.

Giarrusso v. Giarrusso, 528 So. 2d 399, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1115, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1855, 1988 WL 44495 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

528 So. 2d 399 (Giarrusso v. Giarrusso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related