Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Giardino Corp. v. Goldblatt

Giardino Corp. v. Goldblatt

279 A.D. 912, 110 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5288
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 3, 1952
StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D. 912 (Giardino Corp. v. Goldblatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giardino Corp. v. Goldblatt, 279 A.D. 912, 110 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

Although the granting of the motion did not impinge upon the constitutional right to a trial by jury (Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co., 142 N. Y. 236; 4 Carmody on New York Practice, p. 2692, and cases cited) the record did not warrant the granting of a compulsory order of reference on the ground that the examination of a long account was necessary within the meaning of section 466 of the Civil Practice Act, under long-settled authority. (Davidson v. Sterngass, 279 App. Div. 875, and cases cited therein; Untermyer v. Beinhauer, 105 N. Y. 521.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untermyer v. . Beinhauer
11 N.E. 847 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.
37 N.E. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
Davidson v. Sterngass
279 A.D. 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 912, 110 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giardino-corp-v-goldblatt-nyappdiv-1952.