Giardina v. Barclay Arms Associates

228 A.D.2d 678, 644 N.Y.2d 991, 644 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7411

Opinion

The petitioner seeks to recover possession of an apartment which had been leased by her late husband Frank Giardina. The petitioner had been estranged from her husband at the time of his death. Indeed, it is uncontroverted that the petitioner had vacated the premises over one year prior to Frank’s, death and that she had neither returned to the premises nor spoken to Frank again. Under these circumstances, the petitioner is not a person who may maintain this proceeding pursuant to RPAPL article 7 (see, RPAPL 711, 713, 721; see also, 9 NYCRR 2204.6, 2520.6; Koppel v Evelyn, 208 Misc 667; Bowman Realty Corp. v Trice, 205 Misc 588). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giardina v. Barclay Arms Associates, 228 A.D.2d 678, 644 N.Y.2d 991, 644 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 678 (Giardina v. Barclay Arms Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowman Realty Corp. v. Trice
205 Misc. 588 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1954)
Koppel v. Evelyn
208 Misc. 667 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1955)