Giant Portland Cement Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
This text of 184 A.D. 929 (Giant Portland Cement Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment so far as appealed from by the National Bank of Commerce of Rochester reversed, with costs payable out of the fund, and judgment directed in favor of said bank. Held, that the provisions of the Lien Law relating to the filing of assignments of contracts has no application to contracts for State highway work. [930]*930Armstrong v. State Bank of Mayville, 177 App. Div. 265.) Order to be settled before Kruse, P. J., on two days’ notice at which time findings to be disapproved and proposed new findings to be made may be submitted. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 A.D. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giant-portland-cement-co-v-barber-asphalt-paving-co-nyappdiv-1918.