Giant Portland Cement Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Giant Portland Cement Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.

184 A.D. 929

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1918·Published

Opinion

Judgment so far as appealed from by the National Bank of Commerce of Rochester reversed, with costs payable out of the fund, and judgment directed in favor of said bank. Held, that the provisions of the Lien Law relating to the filing of assignments of contracts has no application to contracts for State highway work. [930] Armstrong v. State Bank of Mayville, 177 App. Div. 265.) Order to be settled before Kruse, P. J., on two days’ notice at which time findings to be disapproved and proposed new findings to be made may be submitted. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment so far as appealed from by the National Bank of Commerce of Rochester reversed, with costs payable out of the fund, and judgment directed in favor of said bank. Held, that the provisions of the Lien Law relating to the filing of assignments of contracts has no application to contracts for State highway work. [930] Armstrong v. State Bank of Mayville, 177 App. Div. 265.) Order to be settled before Kruse, P. J., on two days’ notice at which time findings to be disapproved and proposed new findings to be made may be submitted. All concurred.

Giant Portland Cement Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., 184 A.D. 929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

184 A.D. 929 (Giant Portland Cement Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related