Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

994 A.2d 1083, 606 Pa. 50, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1116
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 19, 2010·No. 44 WAL 2010·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19 day of May 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether “compensation” must include medical benefits as well as wage loss benefits under section 314(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 994 A.2d 1083, 606 Pa. 50, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1116 (Pa. 2010).

994 A.2d 1083 (Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
39 A.3d 287 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Stoloff v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
24 A.3d 366 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)