Giangrossi v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 100593d (or.tax 9-27-2010)

Oregon Tax Court

Giangrossi v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 100593d (or.tax 9-27-2010)

DecidedSeptember 27, 2010

DocketTC-MD 100593D.

StatusPublished

This text of Giangrossi v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 100593d (or.tax 9-27-2010) (Giangrossi v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 100593d (or.tax 9-27-2010)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giangrossi v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 100593d (or.tax 9-27-2010), (Or. Super. Ct. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for want of prosecution.

A Journal Entry filed on September 9, 2010, stated the importance of Plaintiffs diligently pursuing their appeal. The Journal Entry stated that "[i]f Plaintiffs [did] not submit a written request to continue their appeal by September 23, 2010, Plaintiffs' appeal [would] be dismissed." (Journal Entry at 1.) As of this date, Plaintiffs have not contacted the court. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for want of prosecution. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed.

Dated this ___ day of September 2010.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in theRegular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to:1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to:Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must besubmitted within 60 days after the date of the Decision or thisDecision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A.Tanner on September 27, 2010. The Court filed and entered thisdocument on September 27, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for want of prosecution.

A Journal Entry filed on September 9, 2010, stated the importance of Plaintiffs diligently pursuing their appeal. The Journal Entry stated that "[i]f Plaintiffs [did] not submit a written request to continue their appeal by September 23, 2010, Plaintiffs' appeal [would] be dismissed." (Journal Entry at 1.) As of this date, Plaintiffs have not contacted the court. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for want of prosecution. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed.

Dated this ___ day of September 2010.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in theRegular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to:1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to:Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must besubmitted within 60 days after the date of the Decision or thisDecision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A.Tanner on September 27, 2010. The Court filed and entered thisdocument on September 27, 2010.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Giangrossi v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 100593d (or.tax 9-27-2010), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giangrossi-v-department-of-revenue-tc-md-100593d-ortax-9-27-2010-ortc-2010.