Giangrasso v. Ass'n for the Help of Retarded Children

243 A.D.2d 680, 664 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10812
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 27, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 243 A.D.2d 680 (Giangrasso v. Ass'n for the Help of Retarded Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giangrasso v. Ass'n for the Help of Retarded Children, 243 A.D.2d 680, 664 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Town Bus Corp. s/h/a Town Transport Bus Co. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), dated September 27, 1996, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant Town Bus Corp. s/h/a Town Transport Bus Co. (hereinafter Town Bus) cannot be held vicariously liable for the intentional tort committed by its employee bus driver, since the employee’s acts were wholly personal in nature, fell outside the scope of his employment, and were not in furtherance of Town Bus’s business (see generally, Riviello v Waldron, 47 NY2d 297; Curtis v City of Utica, 209 AD2d 1024; Kirkman v Astoria Gen. Hosp., 204 AD2d 401). However, the Supreme Court properly denied Town Bus’s motion for summary judgment with regard to the issue of negligent hiring and retention, inasmuch as questions of fact exist as to the adequacy of the screening process by which Town Bus selected new employees and whether it took appropriate measures to evaluate the subject employee’s fitness at the time of his hiring (see, Pratt v Ocean Med. Care, 236 AD2d 380). Copertino, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

C.C. v. Free Methodist Church-USA
2025 NY Slip Op 50866(U) (New York Supreme Court, Monroe County, 2025)
L.B. v. Hanson Place Seventh-Day Adventist Church
2025 NY Slip Op 31080(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2025)
Brauner v. Locust Val. Cent. Sch. Dist.
2025 NY Slip Op 00418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
D.T. v. Sports & Arts in Schs. Found., Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 02556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Sandoval v. Leake & Watts Servs., Inc.
2020 NY Slip Op 08017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Johansmeyer v. New York City Dept. of Educ.
2018 NY Slip Op 6518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Destiny S. v. John Quincy Adams Elementary School
98 A.D.3d 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Fenstermacher v. Nevins Amusements, Inc.
273 A.D.2d 347 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Ceneus v. Beechmont Bus Service
272 A.D.2d 499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Kladstrup v. Westfall Health Care Center, Inc.
183 Misc. 2d 11 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)
Hamilton v. Accu-Tek
62 F. Supp. 2d 802 (E.D. New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D.2d 680, 664 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giangrasso-v-assn-for-the-help-of-retarded-children-nyappdiv-1997.