Gianformaggio v. Burmeister

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gianformaggio v. Burmeister

866 S.W.2d 146, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1731, 1993 WL 453623

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 1993·No. No. 62038·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Georgia Polys and her daughter Christine Gianformaggio, appeal the denial of their joint motion for new trial on damages based on the verdict being against the weight of the evidence and inadequate. We affirm. We find no error of law or abuse of discretion, and further find that the evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Georgia Polys and her daughter Christine Gianformaggio, appeal the denial of their joint motion for new trial on damages based on the verdict being against the weight of the evidence and inadequate. We affirm. We find no error of law or abuse of discretion, and further find that the evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their use only.

Gianformaggio v. Burmeister, 866 S.W.2d 146, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1731, 1993 WL 453623 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

866 S.W.2d 146 (Gianformaggio v. Burmeister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.