Gianetti v. Norwalk Hospital

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Gianetti v. Norwalk Hospital

788 A.2d 95, 258 Conn. 945, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 526

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 4, 2001·No. SC 16640·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition of the named defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 218 (AC 20197), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was a ‘lost volume seller?’

[946] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16640. Robert A. Lacobelle, in support of the petition. William F. Gallagher, in opposition. Decided December 4, 2001

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was not required to mitigate damages, and that he was entitled to more than nominal damages?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition of the named defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 218 (AC 20197), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was a ‘lost volume seller?’

[946] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16640. Robert A. Lacobelle, in support of the petition. William F. Gallagher, in opposition. Decided December 4, 2001

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was not required to mitigate damages, and that he was entitled to more than nominal damages?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Gianetti v. Norwalk Hospital, 788 A.2d 95, 258 Conn. 945, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 526 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

788 A.2d 95 (Gianetti v. Norwalk Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related