Giancola v. Gannett Co.
125 A.D.2d 991, 510 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63185
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 1986·Published
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The court correctly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss this libel complaint. The court erred, however, in finding that the single instance rule does not apply to a complaint alleging libel per se (Amelkin v Commercial Trading Co., 23 AD2d 830, 831, affd 17 NY2d 500; see also, comment, 2 NY PJI 101-102 [Supp]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Giancola v. Gannett Co., 125 A.D.2d 991, 510 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63185 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
125 A.D.2d 991 (Giancola v. Gannett Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Amelkin v. Commercial Trading Co.
214 N.E.2d 379 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
Amelkin v. Commercial Trading Co.
23 A.D.2d 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)