Giancaterino v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedFebruary 29, 2024
Docket21-0542V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Giancaterino v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Giancaterino v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giancaterino v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0542V

ANTHONY GIANCATERINO, SR., Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: January 29, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Michael Joseph Lang, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On January 11, 2021, Anthony Giancaterino, Sr. filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner then filed amended petitions on December 14, 2022 (“First Amended Petition”) and February 20, 2023 (“Second Amended Petition”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on October 9, 2019. Second Amended Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed January 29, 2024, at ¶¶ 2-4 (stating that Petitioner also received a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on or about October 9, 2019). Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccines in the United States, his symptoms lasted for more than six months, and neither Petitioner, nor any other party, has ever filed any action or received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for Petitioner’s vaccine-related injury. Second Amended Petition at ¶¶ 2, 12-14; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5; Ex. 7 at 106. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). the flu or pneumococcal vaccines caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, and further denies that the vaccines caused petitioner to suffer from any other injury or his current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on January 29, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $20,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNJTED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ANTHONY GIANCATERJNO, SR., No. 21-542V Petitioner, Chief Special Master Corcoran ECF V.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Petitioner, Anthony Giancaterino, Sr., filed a petition for vaccine compensation

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to -34 (the

"Vaccine Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to

petitioner's receipt of the influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

''Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the influenza and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on or about

October 9, 2019.

3. The vaccines were administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration

("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the table, or in the alternative, that his alleged

shoulder injury was caused by the vaccines. Petitioner further alleges that he experienced the

residual effects of this condition for more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of his condition.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu

or pneumococcal vaccines caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, and further denies that the

vaccines caused petitioner to suffer from any other injury or his current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent

with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive

compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human

Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $20,000.00 in the fonn of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in this case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Giancaterino v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giancaterino-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.